• 구독신청
  • My스크랩
  • 지면신문
FNTIMES 대한민국 최고 금융 경제지
ad

S-OIL’s Cautious Approach to Fundraising: Focus on Controlling Borrowing Expansion

이성규 기자

lsk0603@fntimes.com

기사입력 : 2025-02-24 16:01

350 Billion KRW Demand Forecast, 10-Year Bonds Included Again, but Issuance Size Gradually Decreasing

Photo=S-Oil Mapo Office Building

Photo=S-Oil Mapo Office Building

[Korea Financial Times, Lee Sungkyu] S-OIL appears to have carefully considered its fundraising strategy. Despite being evaluated as one of the highest-rated AA-grade companies, the company cannot overlook the sharp increase in its outstanding debt.

According to the investment banking (IB) industry on the 24th, S-OIL is conducting a demand forecast for the issuance of public corporate bonds worth 350 billion KRW. The bond maturities are structured as follows: 3-year (200 billion KRW), 5-year (70 billion KRW), 7-year (30 billion KRW), and 10-year (50 billion KRW).

The company has proposed an interest rate band of -30 to +30 basis points (bp) relative to the average private bond evaluation yield for each maturity. Depending on demand forecast results, the issuance size may increase to a maximum of 440 billion KRW. The funds raised will be used entirely for debt repayment.

The joint bookrunners include Samsung Securities, NH Investment & Securities, Shinhan Investment, KB Securities, and Mirae Asset Securities. Daishin Securities, Hana Securities, and iM Securities are participating in underwriting.

S-OIL’s credit rating is AA+ according to Korea Investors Service (KIS), while Korea Ratings (KR) and NICE Investors Service rate it at AA0. However, both KR and NICE have assigned a “Positive” outlook, suggesting a likely upgrade to AA+.

Currently, S-OIL’s private bond evaluation yield for each maturity is lower than the AA+ average yield, indicating that its credit profile is stronger than AA0-rated bonds used for comparison.

For the 10-year bond, the AA+ credit spread (credit yield minus government bond yield) stands at 88bp, while S-OIL’s private bond evaluation yield spread is 54bp. The AA0 credit spread is significantly higher at 122bp.

Source=Financial Investment Association

Source=Financial Investment Association

The government bond yield currently shows a 10-year yield of 2.875%, which is lower than the 7-year yield (2.886%). Typically, longer-term yields are higher, but long-term rates often align with economic growth forecasts. This suggests market concerns about a potential slowdown in Korea’s economic growth.

In such periods, corporate bond issuance can become more challenging, as funds tend to flow into government bonds or high-credit corporate bonds. Even high-rated companies may find it difficult to issue long-term bonds in large amounts.

S-OIL’s bond yield levels indicate that it is among the highest-rated AA+ issuers. However, unlike government bonds, its 10-year bond yield is not lower than its 7-year bond yield. Looking at the credit spreads, they narrow progressively for the 3-year, 5-year, and 7-year bonds but widen significantly for the 10-year bond.

A higher credit spread for the 10-year bond may appeal to investors. Notably, no other domestic refining or petrochemical company issued a 10-year bond last year, nor has any done so this year prior to S-OIL’s issuance.

This suggests that S-OIL is confident in its “top-tier AA+ credit standing.” If investors seek safer investments, demand for S-OIL’s long-term bonds could increase.

S-OIL’s Focus on Debt Management Amid Heavy Investment Burden

Another noteworthy aspect of S-OIL’s bond issuance is the size of the potential upscaling. Recently, companies have been able to increase their issuance volume by up to twice the initial demand forecast amount. However, S-OIL has set its maximum issuance size at 440 billion KRW, corresponding to the amount of its bonds maturing in March. If demand forecast results are unsatisfactory, the company plans to use its existing cash reserves to cover the remaining balance.

This approach can be indirectly understood through credit rating agencies’ criteria for rating adjustments. While KR has assigned an AA+ rating, as of Q3 2023, S-OIL has met some conditions for a potential downgrade.

KIS and NICE have given a “Positive” outlook but have set downgrade triggers that could revert their ratings to “Stable.” This reflects the combination of increased debt due to large-scale investments (such as the Shaheen Project) and deteriorating profitability amid a downturn in the refining and petrochemical industries.

The “Shaheen Project” is part of a strategic initiative led by S-OIL’s largest shareholder, Saudi Aramco. In addition to issuing corporate bonds, S-OIL has been in ongoing discussions with Aramco and financial institutions regarding funding. However, the company appears to be maintaining a cautious stance on increasing its financial burden.

An IB industry insider commented, “S-OIL has historically had a lower credit spread compared to the average for its rating grade. While it has issued 10-year bonds since 2023, the issuance size has been gradually decreasing.” He added, “The longer the maturity, the higher the interest cost. Given the need to manage its debt scale, S-OIL is likely to remain cautious in significantly expanding its bond issuance.”

Lee Sungkyu (lsk0603@fntimes.com)

데일리 금융경제뉴스 FNTIMES - 저작권법에 의거 상업적 목적의 무단 전재, 복사, 배포 금지
Copyright ⓒ 한국금융신문 & FNTIMES.com

가장 핫한 경제 소식! 한국금융신문의 ‘추천뉴스’를 받아보세요~

KFT Topic 다른 기사

1 Celltrion Buys Back Shares, But Merger Bloat Still Drags on Valuation Celltrion announced the cancellation of treasury shares following a share buyback, but the market's reaction has been muted. The underlying reason is seen as the sheer size of the assets and capital that ballooned in the wake of its merger, which continues to weigh on the stock price. While the move was intended to dispel lingering doubts over complex intercompany transactions and accounting transparency, some observers say it has instead exposed the essential nature of the company's corporate value.According to industry sources on the 17th, Celltrion disclosed on the 16th that it would cancel 2 Debt vs. Equity: LG Energy Solution and Samsung SDI Take Diverging Paths Many factors shape corporate value, and a fair assessment requires weighing multiple variables. Through the Altman Z-score, Korea Financial Times aims to take a multidimensional look at a company's current situation, its responses, and its financial soundness, and to explore the meaning hidden within. — Editor's NoteAs signs emerge that the electric vehicle chasm — the temporary slowdown in EV demand — is easing, South Korea's two leading battery makers, LG Energy Solution and Samsung SDI, are tracing diverging paths on the Altman Z-score, a measure of corporate financial risk.Both companie 3 The Three Women Steering Chung Eui-sun's Hyundai Future Few companies embody the identity of a traditional automaker as strongly as Hyundai Motor Group. It was long regarded as a workplace defined by a male-dominated corporate culture and a rigid, seniority-based system of internal promotion.But since the leadership transition to Executive Chair Chung Eui-sun, that glass ceiling has been cracking as women tech leaders rise to prominence under the group's new vision of becoming a "smart mobility solutions provider."What is especially striking is that all three of the future growth businesses on which Chung has staked the group's fortunes — software
ad
ad

한국금융 포럼 사이버관

더보기

FT카드뉴스

더보기
[그래픽 뉴스] ‘순대’가 경제용어라고? 순(純)대외자산, 한국의 진짜 해외자산은 얼마일까?
[그래픽 뉴스] ISA 대개편! 나에게 유리한 계좌는?
[그래픽 뉴스] 미국 증시 새로운 키워드 'MANGOS'
환전·로또·육아휴직까지 하반기부터 달라지는 제도 TOP11
[그래픽 뉴스] 은퇴후 30년 부모님 세대의 생존전략

FT도서

더보기